Australia’s most liveable regional cities revealed

Victoria is home to Australia's most liveable regional cities – Ballarat, Bendigo and Geelong – according to new research that for the first time maps health and liveability across the country’s 21 largest cities.

Ballarat performed best for access to public transport and public open space in the analysis by RMIT University and ranked in the top five for access to supermarkets, local employment and services, and housing affordability based on the summary measures. 

Geelong ranked highly together with Bendigo performing strongly across four of the liveability measures. 

In other states, the most liveable regional cities are Wollongong (NSW), Toowoomba (Queensland) and Launceston (Tasmania).

With Australia’s capital cities booming due to our growing population, lead researcher Dr Lucy Gunn from the RMIT Centre for Urban Research, said regional cities were often missing from the conversation because national liveability data has not been available. 

“One of the key benefits of living in a regional city is that people tend to live close to where they work,” Gunn said.  

“Ballarat and Bendigo performed well on this indicator, as well as access to public transport, which our research shows has major health and wellbeing benefits because it allows residents the opportunity to be more active. 

“The benefit of looking at these liveability measures separately is you can see where each city is performing well and where improvements can be made.” 

Top performing regional cities by liveability measures.
Top performing regional cities by liveability measures.

But Gunn said that some regional cities were at risk of making the same mistakes as the nation’s capitals. 

“Ballarat, Bendigo and other similar-sized regional cities are at a tipping point,” she said.  

“We can see this clearly in the maps and data that they are starting to look like larger cities. 

“Equitable access to key infrastructure such as public transport, healthy food and community services is better in the central, more established areas. This declines as you move to the edge of the city. 

“As we’ve seen in the capital cities, residents on the urban fringe have less access to these services which can impact their health and wellbeing.”

This map of Ballarat's suburbs combines six domains of liveability found to be associated with health and wellbeing outcomes: walkability and access to social infrastructure, public transport, larger public open space, affordable housing and local employment. Areas of Ballarat that performed best for liveabilty are shaded in green. Areas with lower levels of liveabilty shaded in pink.
This map of Ballarat’s suburbs combines six domains of liveability found to be associated with health and wellbeing outcomes: walkability and access to social infrastructure, public transport, larger public open space, affordable housing and local employment. Areas of Ballarat that performed best for liveabilty are shaded in green. Areas with lower levels of liveabilty shaded in pink.

To maintain liveability in regional cities, Gunn suggests careful planning for population growth and recommends avoiding more urban growth on the fringe.  

“The good thing about our regional cities is there is still time to avoid the problems that come with our sprawling capital cities,” she said.  

“There is an opportunity here for regional cities to capitalise on what makes them great and to recognise where they can improve to sustain their liveability for years to come.” 

Drawing on over eight years of research findings, the data for each of the 21 largest cities in Australia is available now via the recently launched Australian Urban Observatory led by Dr Melanie Davern and developed by the RMIT Healthy Liveable Cities Group.  

Individual reports on the 21 cities are available to media upon request. 

For media enquiries, please contact Chanel Koeleman: 0432 140 673 or chanel.koeleman@rmit.edu.au